Say it isn’t so.
Since the end of October is all about scary stories… Just on the heals of Microsoft buying github for US$7.5B last year, IBM has now has purchased Red Hat Linux for a cool US$34B dollars.
Granted, I haven’t used Red Hat in a few years mostly since it is one of the few paid UNIX-based operating systems out there. Ubuntu, backed by Canonical, is clearly the better choice for anyone who knows what’s going on.
IBM is the antithesis of open-source software, as is Microsoft. This is just sad. But good riddance. Now get in the hole, Red Hat.
Submitted for your laughter, a Forrester Consulting announcement which completely misses the point of open-source and its underlying concept of freedom. And when I say freedom, I mean as in “free speech”. Notice that big TM symbol which appears prominently in the middle of the page. Forrester, in touting IBM’s attempt at open-source, has managed to completely trample over the concept in their announcement. Forrester means to prevent anyone else from using the phrase “Total Economic Impact” without indicating that this phrase seemingly is owned by them. I don’t recall voting on this loss of my freedom of speech, do you? And since IBM commissioned Forrester for this work this means that IBM still doesn’t understand the spirit of open-source. Patents, trademarks and copyrights are the antithesis to the open-source movement.
“Patents, trademarks and copyrights are the antithesis to the open-source movement.”
Don’t be fooled by huge corporations like IBM and like Microsoft who pretend to embrace the open-source community. They don’t see things like you or I do. You and I might see open-source as a means of making the world better. They see open-source as a means of getting software made for free. And yet, this won’t convert into lowered prices for consumers, it will convert into higher profits for the owners of their stock.
In a similar manner, I should claim a trademark for the term Bite My Shiny Metal Open-Sourced Ass, ________™. But then again, that would just limit your free speech and I’m not into that. Tell you what, I’ve decided to be generous and instead claim a copyleft for that phrase—the public is now free to repeat that as much as they want as long as they not alter the infringement status. In fact, I encourage you to use that phrase when you are annoyed by any patent-holding company trying to pretend to be open-source friendly.
Go and do likewise. If you see a big corporation claiming to love open-source and yet they have a habit of patenting common phrases then you know they’re full of it. Call them on it and let others know.
good friendlier better guys: