Lately, there’s been a push to convince girls to learn how to be software developers. Inside these initiatives, the individuals who are part of the movement are attempting to empower people to achieve more with their lives. I would suggest that this is the best part of this new idea.
But what if you pulled back the curtain to reveal that there’s a secret business reason behind all of this outside these initiatives? What if big business is the real driving force here? What could they possibly want out of potentially doubling the workforce within the software development space? Obviously they want what they already have in the clothing industry: sweatshops.
“What could they [big business] possibly want out of potentially doubling the workforce within the software development space? Obviously they want what they already have in the clothing industry: sweatshops.”
sweatshop – noun
A factory, especially in the clothing industry, where manual workers are employed at very low wages for long hours and under poor conditions.
Think about it for a moment. Is Google [US$90B/year] such an Andy Griffith—friendly company that it wants to empower young girls to realize their potential… or does it want more profits?
Simple economics at work
The economics of supply and demand suggest that if you double the supply of software developers then the price for software development projects will reasonably be half. If Google can flood the marketplace with coders then the price for development should plummet as a result.
The following photo is a typical Nike factory. You might ask yourself why all of the factory workers are young girls. Well, they work for a fraction of the cost of their male or older counterparts in the workforce. And given what we know about dominance and submissiveness, young girls will more likely just do what you tell them to do without rebelling (against horrible working conditions, for example).
Imagine how you’d feel if suddenly boys and men were being “sold” this idea that they should be coding right now at the same rate that young girls are being advertised to. It would seem weird and creepy, actually. A quick Google search will show you just how many of these girls + coding websites, organizations and meetups have recently been spawned.
A great litmus test for sexism, racism or any “-ism” is to just change out the race and gender, for example. If the result sounds wrong then by definition the original was also wrong for the same reasons.
Examples from actual websites
Here, I make those changeouts to highlight what I’m seeing:
http://www.girlswhocode.com => http://www.boyswhocode.com
http://www.girldevelopit.com => http://www.boydevelopit.com
http://www.blackgirlscode.com => http://www.whiteboyscode.com
If the changed-out version sounds politically-incorrect then the original is by definition just as wrong.
Who to trust
So who do you trust at the end of the day? On one side you have a number of friendly-sounding organizations who seem to be working to make things better for girls and women. On the other side you have a collection of corporations who have a habit of maximizing their profits by using unsustainable working conditions.
Feel free to join the software development field regardless of your gender or race. Just don’t be fooled by big business into working in a coding sweatshop, if you will, because you’re desperate for work and because you lack the confidence that some of your co-workers possess.